/* https://docs.google.com/document/d/15tCLPcABYFRLwqx6hF2oV11bOcl7-Pa29r1H7h7oo_o/edit [restricted] Evaluating the cost effectiveness of adding straw bedding (shortened as EE - environmental enrichment) on pig welfare. Unmodeled assumptions: 1. The only outcome metric we look at is reduction in tail-biting injuries. (This seems likely to be the most important identifiable metric, and I'd be somewhat surprised [20%] if reduction in tail biting accounts for less than 10% of the impact) 2. Disregarding additional indirect effects */ number_of_pigs_in_eu = 120M to 150M // https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agricultural_production_-_livestock_and_meat prevalence_ee_in_eu_now = beta(1,1) // not likely to be very close to 1
// ------------------------- // general functions // ------------------------- cost_effectiveness(cost, effect) = cost / effect result( charity_cost, total_cost, effect_in_doubling_consumption, effect_in_DALYs ) = Plot.dists(
cost_effectiveness(cost, effect) = cost / effect result(charity_cost, total_cost, effect_in_doubling_consumption, effect_in_DALYs) = Plot.dists( { dists: [ { name: "charity$/doubling", value: cost_effectiveness(charity_cost, effect_in_doubling_consumption), }, { name: "charity$/DALY",